About moral anecdotes I hate. Sobre anedotas morais que odeio. A propos d'anecdotes morales que je hais.

About moral anecdotes and collective judgments of everyday life that I hate: that unbearable and repeated story a million times about Joseph who was an example to be followed by being rich but humble. There is always great emphasis on the counterpoint, something that is even said in solemn form, an order to rethink your deeds, 'cause Joseph, "was somebody who you gave nothing to", for his simplicity, but now he taught you a lesson on appearances, because he is in reality very rich. You see, at no time does anyone shout "guillotine at the rich", the rich are our heroes and respected examples. A life lesson in appearances and humility, as if my generation had never seen an advertising hamburger McDonalds and the real product itself. Ideal and real. It is obvious that they are different and that the image is only a spectral representation of another image, so earthy and artificial, as, in short, this story is a bullshit and, besides that, it would not also fair have the right to the same compassion and even the right to the same protagonism, "the John, the poor, but proud" one? Why does "The poor but proud John" not also have a popular anecdote as the other, for even more psychological torture against me? In fact they could put both in a gladiatorial fight to death and crucifixion, as they did in Rome, "The rich but humble Joseph" versus "The poor but proud John".

***

Sobre anedotas morais e julgamentos coletivos do cotidiano que eu odeio: aquela história insuportável e repetida um milhão de vezes sobre José que era um exemplo a ser seguido por ser rico, porém humilde. Há sempre grande ênfase no contraponto, algo que é dito até mesmo em formato solene, uma ordem para repensar seus atos, pois José, "era alguém que você não dava nada", pela simplicidade, mas agora ele te ensinou uma lição sobre aparências, porque ele é rico. Veja bem, em nenhum momento alguém grita "guilhotina nos ricos", os ricos são nossos heróis e exemplos respeitados. Uma lição de vida sobre aparências e humildade, como se a minha geração nunca tivesse visto um hambúrguer publicitário do mcdonalds e o produto real. Ideal e real. É óbvio que são diferentes e que a imagem é apenas representação espectral de uma outra imagem, tão terrena e artificial quanto, enfim, essa história é uma droga e, além disso, não teria também direito à mesma compaixão e até direito a um local de fala, o jamais escutado, João que é pobre, porém soberbo? Por que João pobre porém soberbo não tem também uma historieta popular para ainda mais tortura psicológica? Aliás poderiam pôr ambos em uma luta de gladiadores até a morte e crucificação, como faziam em roma, José rico porém humilde vs João pobre mas soberbo.

***

A propos d'anecdotes morales et de jugements collectifs de la vie quotidienne que je hais: cette histoire insupportable et répétée mille fois sur Joseph qui fut un exemple à suivre en étant riche;. Il y a toujours une grande emphase sur le contrepoint, quelque chose qui est même dit sous forme solennelle, un ordre pour repenser vos actions, parce que Joseph était quelqu'un à qui vous n'avez donné rien, pour sa simplicité, mais maintenant il vous a donné une leçon de la vie, leçon sur les apparences, parce qu'il est en réalité très riche, mais humble. Vous voyez, à aucun moment quelqu'un ne crie guillotine aux riches, les riches sont nos héros et nos respectés exemples morales. Une leçon de vie dans les apparences et l'humilité, comme si ma génération n'avait vu la publicité de mcdonald burger et le vrai produit lui-même. Idéal et réel. Il est évident qu'ils sont différents et que l'image n'est qu'une représentation spectrale d'une autre image, tellement terrestre et artificiel, car, en somme, cette histoire est une connerie et, en plus de cela, elle n'aurait pas le droit à la même compassion et même le droit au même protagonisme, le Jean pauvre mais fier? Pourquoi le Jean pauvre mais fier n'a-t-il pas aussi une anecdote populaire comme l'autre, pour encore plus de torture psychologique contre moi? En fait, ils pouvaient mettre les deux dans un combat de gladiateurs à la mort et à la crucifixion, comme ils l'ont fait à Rome, "Jean pauvre mais fier" contre "Joseph, le riche mais humble".

go for a beer young boy, you deserve it.

***

***

Please make a donation. I live in the third world and to continue any work, writing and artistic production, videos or images, I need your financial engagement to not end up in one of the mass exploitation factories of the Brazilian market dictatorship. Please!!!!! Any value counts, 50 reais (12,5 $) is little out there but it makes a big difference here.

Em moeda €€€ EURO:

Em moeda $$$ DOLLAR:

Em moeda nacional R$:

Conta corrente:

Ag: 8351

cc: 15578-6

****

Mes motivations, vive la liberté!

Past and present, man, woman and cannabis.

Sometimes I think what I am today is a desesperated expression for what I was in the past. Everyone's judge my present decisions but what I want it more is to have neither a decision, only chances and curiosity, as we had it when in child form... I am compassionated by animals because of that, at least their past don't prejudice their whole life, and even when the past arises is never with ressentment, my baby cat, a glorius grey mother, when in my contact, after being adopted by a friend of mine, come running to me, knowing me, making her own voice (that we called it as grounings, in our own pedestal of sounds of course), and what I mean is they are all conscious, with past and present, but their past is irrelevant in some ways, while many of us are living forever in and striving no change out from our pasts. In my teenager years the feminine side of me, my mother, was excruciated, so the truth changed for me, all of them are liars, woman are not bad, I am not a man, I hate the man. My father becomes the father figure or the opressive system against myself and my intuition for what is right or wrong, so since then I get my own considerations for what is right and no man will or can control me in that, so I was definitely crazy, like a mk ultra agent, totally fucked up for ideology, anyone's sees that? So after years, basically now in my 30's (Im 27yold) I make peace with myself, in the sense that I respect my feminine side and i think the masculine statuses are not so evilship anymore, even understanding how the patriarchy is actually a Real and nightmarishly ideology still running inside the machine, one of his favorite apps, the system, other of his apps is economic war and latin america exploitation, his energy comes from that, so I think even knowing how masculine opressive ideology is real, I kind of can't care for anything of that and I really love man and woman, and theres no ideology to apart me from that, i will never be anymore in monogamy, because is a lie to divide and conquer ours values. Is part of the propaganda, they call it """natural""""", so natural.... Super natural.... The only natural thing we have in brazil is our land being burned for Monsanto soy dream and prohibited cannabis.

go for a beer young boy, you deserve it.

***

***

Please make a donation. I live in the third world and to continue any work, writing and artistic production, videos or images, I need your financial engagement to not end up in one of the mass exploitation factories of the Brazilian market dictatorship. Please!!!!! Any value counts, 50 reais (12,5 $) is little out there but it makes a big difference here.

Em moeda €€€ EURO:

Em moeda $$$ DOLLAR:

Em moeda nacional R$:

Conta corrente:

Ag: 8351

cc: 15578-6

****

Mes motivations, vive la liberté!

Did Hitler ever say "We most close union offices, confiscate their money…"? (And does it matter?)

"We must close union offices, confiscate their money and put their leaders in prison. We must reduce workers salaries and take away their right to strike" (attributed to Adolf Hitler). 

The above quote gets a lot of traction on the Internet, and I think it's another one of those memes that too few people debunk or even bother to investigate. I've tried, and despite thousands of Internet posts to the contrary, I have never found any real proof that Hitler ever said these particular words. But that doesn't mean they aren't substantially suggestive of what his positions on trade unions were. They are. American conservative propagandists (such as the famously stupid Breitbartian fame whore, Brooks Bayne) frequently try to claim that Hitler, whom in their ignorance they mislabel a "socialist," couldn't possibly have been anti-union, because, to paraphrase their apocryphal idiocy, "everyone knows socialists are a worker's party." In fact, even really lazy students of history know that the Nazis used the socialist label to sucker workers into thinking they cared about their interests, solely for purposes of using their community organizing outreach apparatus, and intimidate anyone on their membership rosters. The Nazis—and especially their Führer—detested Marxists in general and Communists in particular. And since their power ultimately derived from the rich, slave-labor-loving industrialists (in Germany and the United States), unions were the absolutely last people on their Christmas card list. Hitler suppressed trade unions (along with Communists and Social Democrats) in early 1933. It was a key part of their rise to power. They raided and destroyed offices, liberated printing presses and other hardware and beat or imprisoned members and especially leaders. The SS and their brownshirt stooges rampaged through every trade union office of the Social Democrats, took control of their newspapers and other publications, and seized almost all of their financial assets. Except for a few placeholder puppets, most real union officials were either killed or removed to the concentration camps. The net effect was to crush any power that the trade unions had so the Nazi's could use the shell of what remained for their own propaganda purposes. But don't take my word for it. Take it from one of the word's foremost historians and a true expert on the Third Reich, who is the source behind my words above: The Coming of the Third Reich by Richard J. Evans 

History counts 

http://shoqvalue.com/did-hitler-ever-say-we-most-close-union-offices-confiscate-their-money-and-does-it-matter/ 

answer by Recoloniser 

I believe you are correct, except for one thing: the reduction of salaries. Hitler was very wary of potential unrest among the working class. He firmly believed in the "dagger-in-the-back" myth which blamed Germany's defeat in the First World War on the communists fomenting the working class into revolution and he was determined to avoid anything similar from happening again. To that end he destroyed the communists and the socialists and dismantled the unions, but he also made sure that the working classes' material conditions were such that no grounds for unrest would arise. Hitler avoided putting the German economy on a war footing during the first half of WWII and did not introduce wholesale distribution of primary necessities until 1943 or 1944. After the German victory over France in 1940 he had a substantial part of the army discharged also to avoid discontent amongst the people and to allow them to go back to work to increase productivity and thereby the living standards of the people. All this to make sure people's material comforts were seen to as much as possible, not out of concern for the people, but in order to keep them quiet... 

 *****

go for a beer young boy, you deserve it.

***

***

Please make a donation. I live in the third world and to continue any work, writing and artistic production, videos or images, I need your financial engagement to not end up in one of the mass exploitation factories of the Brazilian market dictatorship. Please!!!!! Any value counts, 50 reais (12,5 $) is little out there but it makes a big difference here.

Em moeda €€€ EURO:

Em moeda $$$ DOLLAR:

Em moeda nacional R$:

Conta corrente:

Ag: 8351

cc: 15578-6

****

Mes motivations, vive la liberté!