I personally don't believe in addictions, in addicts, in government solutions for crime and drug control, etc. In other words, all this open questions are all of them some sort of scam, a fraud, their schemes are all for money laundering or imprisonment. It's not a vanguard insight to say that, everyone knows that. You take their pro-profit clinics for rehab, rehabilitation, etc, it's a fraud, they simple retire, sometimes by force, a person from his past habits and insert him in other circunstance, its just a sociological thing. Addiction suppose that a person lost his power to do any choice for his own sake. Freedom of choice is the whole point. The vote, the right to vote, our personal will, it's all linked to the ideia of will. Sometimes even with the notion of virtù. How can I lost my free will by some creepy state regulation? Or some abstraction, as crime or psychologycal dependence. Am i being clear? The governmen leaves some group of people by themselves (as the liberaltards wants) and when they can even eat (because all the trees are cut and supermarkets are expensive and even more people are jobless in the post economic crisis society), the state still keep themself far away from any public social care. The political parties are the same. All the big schemes of drug trafficking have connexions in politics. Talking about the Brazilian reality. And the churches have their way to the money too, they are all for money laundering and maintenance of status quo or for personal opression of thinking by some horrible ideology of violence, born from normative rules. And the whole point is: addiction does not exist. I can't be a drunk without buying drinks or beer. Cost money. Addiction does not exist in scarcity. Cost money, time and some bottles to be a drunk. It's not easy. Society creates her own problems and categories, classification, and some of these adjectives are used for political and cultural control, or even to approve some laws against specifics groups. So I'll only be an addict if I enlist through myself some corporal movements, appearance, habits. Cannabis for instance, what define who is the called recreational user and who is the drug dealer? Its really important this différence? In brazil its a racist statement, when the recreational user is the white one, of course. And all this is bullshit. Some cops are in general poor or middle class. Mindset fucktarded. The civilized and educated cops are in the good neighborhoods. Im kind of impressed how people can really believe in government bullshit rethoric, when they say "its science" or "its scientific statement" when all the lies are cleary by politic issues. I mean, emprisonnent, mass encarceration its a fraud. We have choice, but sometimes we don't understand or see these choices because the system, the """free""" market, the big government not necessarily keep the rights clear or explain all the things someone could do with the right information. It's clearly censorship and information control to keep all workers in the literal hell. If I don't need a gun, or crack, will someone will need it? Yes, because social causes. My correct response: just rethoric. I don't believe in addiction. I only believe in sociological causes and consequences of misery.
***
Please make a donation. I live in the third world and to continue any work, writing and artistic production, videos or images, I need your financial engagement to not end up in one of the mass exploitation factories of the Brazilian market dictatorship. Please!!!!! Any value counts, 50 reais (12,5 $) is little out there but it makes a big difference here.
Em moeda €€€ EURO:
Em moeda $$$ DOLLAR:
